Yes, this was a bug that should be fixed - you should have only
exactly one myfacesxxx.jar file in your temp-folder.

If not, delete all the old files, check out the latest sources and try again!

regards,

Martin


On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:41:15 -0600, Nail, Evan Burke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't remember exactly, but I could swear someone posted that it was a 
> myfaces bug and has been fixed in a nightly build. I searched the archives 
> and could only find the thread listed below which doesn't point to a 
> resolution.
> 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=2086529
> 
> The thread where someone identified the fixed build may have been before the 
> list cut-over..but I'm not sure.
> 
> bn
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrien FOURES [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:42 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: Problem config myfaces tomcat5
> 
> It is eclipse who build efs_XXXXX.jar in my temp folder, any body see
> it, what is the solution?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Adrien
> 
> Adrien FOURES wrote:
> 
> > I use tomcat 5.0.28, and eclipse to develop,  who build jar (which
> > contain myfaces class, and my faces tld .. ) in my temp folder
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Adrien
> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and 
> may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the 
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others 
> is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized 
> to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron 
> Corp. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail 
> (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an 
> acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract 
> between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or 
> any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a 
> contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
> 
>

Reply via email to