> I've been poking around the new subview stuff Craig has added to > Shale. Do you know if it supports Tiles yet? I seem to recall that > is in Craig's long range plan... (Documentation is obviously a little > sketchy at this point)
I know that tiles support is something that he plans to include because the mentioned that when I approached him about my subview ideas. I don't think that he has committed yet if it's done. He indicated that he’s been consumed. Gary > > sean > Gary, > > I've been poking around the new subview stuff Craig has added to > Shale. Do you know if it supports Tiles yet? I seem to recall that > is in Craig's long range plan... (Documentation is obviously a little > sketchy at this point) > > sean > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 20:11:14 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Is it simple to integrate tiles with myfaces ? > > > Works MyFaces bester with Sitemesh ? > > > > > > > > > Toughts ? > > > > > > > This is could be kind of an interesting option. I'm not sure if this is > > the > vision that you are seeing but I suppose that a subcomponent tree could be > constructed for an XHTML fragment? What if you where able to wrapper the > request and response and a context object and then perform an HTTP "include" > to > a Sitemesh template. Then take the data in the wrapper response and use it > to > add on to the component tree. Maybe an adaptor could be snapped in to > support > different types of defining documents (XHTML, XML, HTML). I think you would > loose allot of what faces has to offer if you didn't provide a way to > register > listeners taking advantage of the full lifecycle. > > > > Gary > > > >
