|
Hi Martin, I'm sorry for stirring up an old thread of the mailing list but parts of the mail archive were broken as well. I was just coincidence that I came across the mailing list (Java User Group Austria, chat with Reinhard Pötz about Jakarta Committers in Austria, MyFaces, three guys from an Austrian bank?). And it's plainly none of my business but I was curious why Forrest would be used when many Jakarta projects migrate to Maven. Having said that I can't volunteer to maintain a Maven build for myFaces since I'm not going to use myFaces and already have too much involvement in other Open Source projects - but I can always help with Maven problems ... :-) Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl PS: If the rumours are correct we could go for a beer .... ;-) Martin Marinschek wrote: Hi, well, a discussion about taking maven as a build tool has been taking place on the mailing list a while ago, and the majority wanted to stay with ant; especially as we all don't have much experience with maven and our IDEs offer great ANT integration...So you would definitely need to discuss this on the mailing list, and find someone who is experienced in writing Maven-build-files if you want to go in this direction. Siegfried, do you want to volunteer ;) ? regards, Martin On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:43:23 -0500, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Maven is interesting (I haven't used it yet myself) but it sounds like MyFaces developers would prefer to stick with Forrest. sean On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:46:08 +0100, Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |
