I didn't think that the DTD specified order.  Neither of the orders
threw XML validation errors in WSAD, so I'm guessing that means that
the order isn't specified, but I could of course be wrong.


On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, Srikanth Madarapu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it not relating to the order defined in the corresponding DTD ?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heath Borders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:01 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: Funny parsing.
> 
> Yeah, I tried that and it worked, but it just doeesn't make sense to
> me why.  According to the digester 1.5 javadocs, the digester is set
> up properly, and my XML document is well-formed, so I just don't get
> it.
> 
> Its working now, so I'm not going to invest a lot of time in it, but
> this is a problem that should be addressed.
> 
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:58:33 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have a faces-config file that resides in the META-INF folder in a
> > > jar file that gets automatically parsed by the FacesConfigurator on
> > > startup.
> > >
> > > Here comes the weirdness:
> > >
> > > I havea  couple of validator entries in that faces-config file that
> > > cause the digester to bring certain elements in out of order, and skip
> > > some elements all together.
> >
> > I've seen similar behavior but I was using the wildcard xpath.
> >
> >                digester.addObjectCreate(
> >                        "*/validator",
> >                        com......ValidatorBean.class);
> >                digester.addSetProperties("*/validator");
> >                digester.addSetNext(
> >                        "*/validator",
> >                        "addValidator",
> >                        "com.......ValidatorBean");
> >
> > I was able to reorder the sequence of registering the rules and it fixed 
> > the problem?  I didn't take the time to understand the significance of 
> > sequence when adding rules.  You might try registering before the 
> > renderkit, if your not already?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> 
> --
> -Heath Borders-Wing
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-- 
-Heath Borders-Wing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to