Jon,
my interpretation of the statement would be that the model don't need
to be marked serializable because they are not handled thru the
default serialization mechanism
Heinz
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:18:19 -0600, Jonathan Eric Miller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked the JSF developers at Sun the question about why DataModels are not
> Serializable and this is the response I got. Not sure exactly what it
> means... I'm guessing it means that JSF internal components, don't support
> Serialization, so, even if the DataModels were Serializable, it still
> wouldn't work?
>
> Jon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ed Burns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jonathan Eric Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:42 PM
> Subject: DataModels not Serializable?
>
> >>>>>> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:21:11 -0600, Jonathan Eric Miller
> >>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > JM> Hi. I'm wondering if there is a reason why the DataModels such as
> > JM> ListDataModel are not Serializable?
> >
> > Because the state management mechanism does not use Serialization.
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > --
> > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | {home: 407 294 2468, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
> > | aim: edburns0sunw | iim: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
