My preference is to have them in the sandbox once its available. It will be easier to get them into MyFaces that way (bypassing the incubator). As Martin suggests, go ahead with SF if you need to get started right away. As soon as the sandbox is available, we'll post an announcement and we should probably move it then.
If a component never gets voted out of the sandbox we can always drop it and make it available on SF again. sean On 4/26/05, Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We develop them just outside, to get things going faster... and easier to > setup > > When they have reached a "decent" degree of maturity and a "sufficient" > number of > people requesting them to be delivered as part of MyFaces, then the MyFaces- > developers can import them into the correct MyFaces subproject > > If a component does "not make it into MyFaces", does not mean, that it is > worth nothing, it still can be reused by somebody needing it... > > AND > I would prefer to develop them in a way, that makes it possible to use > under the RI and under MyFaces... > > Alexander > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Enrique Medina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 2:38 PM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: Crumb component > > But shall we develop the components under the umbrella of MyFaces, or > totally independent? > > On 4/26/05, Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > definitely go ahead with that, cause setting the sandbox up will take > > some time you should probably not waste ;) > > -----Original Message----- > > > > Done. > > The request for setting up "JSF components" has been made. > > As soon as I get the confirmation of its approval I will inform you. > > > > Let's hope we can start our community of component developers. Instilling > > the mentality of "share & reuse" into those developers who will start using > > JSF in the near future... > > > > Alexander > > >
