Which one would be easier: - support tree2 with treeColumn
Or - add hideRoot, & client-side expansion to tree? The refactoring you're talking about, is this checked-in and in the latest source? -----Original Message----- From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 3:54 PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: tree2 with treeColumn? > is it possible to use treeColumn with tree2 to create a tree table? No. Not yet anyways ;-) I started to work on this and I refactored tree2 to make it easier. I made a good deal of progress but then we decided to keep tree and tree2 (instead of merging the two) so I lost interest. I think a tree inside a table has limited usefulness but several users seem to think its a good idea. Like I said, I have done a lot of the refactoring work necessary behind the scenes so the right methods can be overridden. If you (or someone else) wants to take a stab at it, I'd be happy to take a look. One issue I think I was having trouble with was making it support both client and server-side toggle inside the table. Hiding the table rows, etc. in the javascript mode was a bit messy. sean *********************************************************************** Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation, offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer account or account activity contained in this communication. ***********************************************************************
