@John: XHTML is stricter in what is allowed than XML alone would be, you are right...
@Hendrik: now you shouldn't have a problem at all with the id's - they are completely valid in the XML specifications, though the leading underscore disturbs in the XHTML spec? regards, Martin On 5/21/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wow, that was fast and mani-voiced ;) > > I personally didn't know about the colons and if those were invalid, > but the leading underscore (of automatically assigned ids) is though, > and the HTML validator always complained about that. > > I wonder why you, Norbert, don't have any problems with that? > > regards, > > Martin > > On 5/20/05, Csík Norbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'm generating XHTML output without any problem at page validation > > (using Firefox). > > > > -- > > Csík Norbert http://norbert.web.elte.hu/ > > Programtervező matematikus > > Trilobita Informatikai Rt. - rendszertervező fejlesztőmérnök > > ___ keep sm:)ing _________________________ooo__C( O O )L__ooo__ > > http://www.aion.hu/ - A csik.NET otthona > > http://www.spreadfirefox.com/ - Rediscover the web > > Légy pontos: Mérj mikro-milliméterben! Jelölj krétával! Vágj baltával! > > >
