|
It's a very interesting topic you are all discussing. I’m looking to do kind of the same. I want to use the WML renderkit to render the custom
JSF “HTML” components like “data_table”, so it is possible in the jsp files to
use the standard HTML tags and not the wap ones. <h:dataTable….. instead of <wap:dataTable…. Have anybody tried this before? Kind
Regards, Michael
Hartmann Email:
mh AT eyeloop DOT net On 6/16/05, Martin Marinschek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you are absolutely right, would be nice to have
a fully validated renderkit. > > If you look into your faces-config.xml (the one
which is delivered > with MyFaces), you will find a render-kit node
which looks something > like the following: > > > <!-- MyFaces Renderkit Extensions --> > > <render-kit> >
<render-kit-id>HTML_BASIC</render-kit-id> > > <!-- extended standard renderers
--> > > <renderer> >
<component-family>javax.faces.Command</component-family> >
<renderer-type>org.apache.myfaces.Button</renderer-type> >
<renderer-class>org.apache.myfaces.renderkit.html.ext.HtmlButtonRenderer</renderer-class> > </renderer> > > <renderer> >
<component-family>javax.faces.Command</component-family> > <renderer-type>org.apache.myfaces.Link</renderer-type> >
<renderer-class>org.apache.myfaces.renderkit.html.ext.HtmlLinkRenderer</renderer-class> > </renderer> > > ..... > > > What you do know is copy this render-kit node to
a separate location > in your personal (or if you donate it back to
MyFaces, to the MyFaces > one) faces-config.xml. > > First change the renderkit to something like
HTML_401 or whatever you want. > > Next change all the renderer-class entries to
the classes you implemented. > > Done - all you have to do now is to reset your
renderkit id in the > application section of the faces-config,
something like that: > > ... > <application> >
<default-render-kit-id>HTML_401</default-render-kit-id> > </application > ... > > regards, > > Maritn > > > > > > On 6/16/05, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: > > Martin Marinschek wrote: > > > > >Well, yes, but in this case you are
reusing the standard renderkit! > > > > > >if you just want to define an
additional renderkit, you "copy" the > > >standard render-kit definition, give it
a new rederkit-id, set your > > >renderer names as appropriate, and set
the default renderkit to your > > >special render-kit id.... > > > > > >regards, > > > > > >Martin > > > > > >On 6/15/05, Mark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >>Craig McClanahan wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>On 14 Jun 2005 12:42:01 -0000,
mfaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>Basically I just need to
know how to make the current myfaces components use > > >>>>my Renderer classes which
are subclasses of the ones that come with myfaces. > > >>>>If anyone can tell me how
or point me to the right docs I would appreciate it. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>You can accomplish this by
defining your own renderer elements in a > > >>>faces-config.xml file that is
loaded *after* the standard one for the > > >>>JSF implementation you are
using. The key requirement is to use the > > >>>same values for <renderer-type>
and <component-family> that the > > >>>standard renderer definitions
do (for the standard components, these > > >>>values are all in the JSF spec;
for the MyFaces extension components, > > >>>look in the faces-config.xml
file that defines them). > > >>> > > >>>Craig > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>Thanks, > > >>>>-Mark > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>Thanks, I think I got this working
now. > > >> > > >>-Mark > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you point me to more detailed
instructions on doing that? I'm > > interested in possibly offering up any
changes back to the myfaces > > developers. It would be better in that
case that it be a separate > > render kit instead of reusing the standard
render kit. > > > > Thanks, > > -Mark > > > > > |
