Yes javascript is essentially required but in the MyFaces case, it creates a hidden form for you.
sean On 6/21/05, CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll see what I can do. > > I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that a command link > *does* have to be inside a form, since, as Hans Bergsten, in his > O'Reilly book, puts it, it "renders the component as an HTML <a> element > attribute ... containing JavaScript code for submitting the form the > component belongs to with the component's client ID as a request > parameter." > > However, the odd thing is that I surrounded the whole thing with > <h:form>...</h:form> anyway (just a regular Sun JSF form, not a MyFaces > form), and the error still occurs. > > I'll keep plugging away.... > > - Brendan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 3:48 PM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: Using Tree2 with WebSphere 5.1 > > > I haven't run tree2 on the RI and from what you are describing it > sounds like there may be a problem. > > My gut instinct tells me that there is a problem with the RI because > AFAIK there is no spec requirement that a commandLink be inside of a > form. Of course I haven't read the spec that carefully ;-) > > Can you help me to investigate this? Check the spec to see if this is > a requirement. Also check sun's JSF forum and see if there have been > posts already regarding this and if there is a consensus that this is > a bug or not. > > That would help out big time. I can look into it but I am a bit > swamped at the moment. Just came back from 2 weeks out of country and > now I'm dealing with reorganizing the entire SVN repository for > MyFaces. > > sean > > On 6/21/05, CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm. That's what I thought also, although I've tried to get it to > work > > with just myfaces-extensions.jar and the Sun RI, with no luck. I've > > only gotten it to work if I use the entire myfaces.jar (and not the > Sun > > implementation). > > > > I modified the example jsp somewhat, because it uses a non-standard > > borders="0" argument in the <h:graphicImage> tag, and I put an > <h:form> > > tag to be able to test the page by itself, but, even though all the > code > > is now surrounded by <h:form>...</h:form>, the main problem seems to > be > > that I get the following message: > > > > [6/21/05 15:21:30:543 CDT] 79d4fe94 CommandLinkRe E > > com.sun.faces.renderkit.html_basic.CommandLinkRenderer component > _id107 > > must be enclosed inside a form > > > > - Brendan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 3:12 PM > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > Subject: Re: Using Tree2 with WebSphere 5.1 > > > > > > Use myfaces-extensions.jar (see the binary release and/or nightly > > build.) Its designed to run with RI or any other implementation. > > Whichever impl you use it should be JSF 1.1 - nobody has tested tree2 > > with JSF 1.0 so who knows if that works or not. > > > > sean > > > > On 6/21/05, CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks, Sean. > > > > > > Given that, is there an easy way to obtain the minimal set of > classes > > > needed from the MyFaces distribution to get just the Tree2 > component's > > > capability (without laboriously loading one class after another to > see > > > which dependencies are still broken)? Ideally, I'd like to crisply > > take > > > just the Tree2 component (and any of the other MyFaces classes on > > which > > > it depends) and plop it into my server environment. At this point, > I > > > would like to avoid using the MyFaces JSF implementation, if > possible, > > > but I would be interested in using the Tree2 component. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > - Brendan > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 2:49 PM > > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > > Subject: Re: Using Tree2 with WebSphere 5.1 > > > > > > > > > You should be able to use whatever version of JSF you want. I don't > > > use WS but you can probably tinker with the server libraries and > > > replace them with whatever version you want. > > > > > > sean > > > > > > On 6/7/05, CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Has anyone gotten Tree2 to work with WebSphere 5.1? I realize > that > > > > WebSphere is only JSF 1.0 compatible, but I didn't see anything in > > the > > > > code that required JSF 1.1. However, when trying to run the > > example, > > > I > > > > got an Error 500: Assertion Failed at the following location in > > > > HtmlTreeRenderer: > > > > > > > > private void encodeRecursive(FacesContext context, UIComponent > > > > component) throws IOException > > > > { > > > > /[EMAIL PROTECTED] consider moving this common functionality to > > > > a > base > > > > class or utility class */ > > > > if (!component.isRendered()) return; > > > > > > > > component.encodeBegin(context); > > > > > > > > - Brendan > > > > > > > > > >
