Thanks
Hopefully, I shd be able to extend my little help once I get things sorted out at work. Do you know where I can browse through the source for the example application? Even a online browse would help me. Thanks Balaji -----Original Message----- From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 2:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: Compatibility with SUN RI Sorry for that, you are absolutely right, we should provide examples for doing this. It is just not easy to cope with all the work this project involves along with a full time day job, and this is probably why absolutely necessary things like this are left out. I can promise you though that you will see much more work going on in the components part in the next time (especially after the refactoring in a separate subproject), and that we will hopefully find a better way to handle situations like this. regards, Martin On 6/22/05, Balaji Saranathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tx . > > Bang on the target. That's what I'm going through....I really want to > use the tree2 of Myfaces, however, I need to tell if they would run on > SUN RI (just in case) else, I have to go and develop it myself. But I > hardly have a day to say if it would work or not :-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:25 AM > To: MyFaces Discussion; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Compatibility with SUN RI > > > Just a comment on that: To gain wider adoption of the components, it > would be preferable to have a complete set of examples included with > the distribution that are independent of the JSF implementation chosen > (i.e., that have been tested on at least one implementation other than > MyFaces). After all, that's the whole idea behind Java and J2EE. ;-) > > It's not just a minor point, either. Some people have just one or two > weeks to evaluate the different alternatives for use at their > respective organizations, and not all organizations want to use the > MyFaces JSF implementation. If they can't get up and running fairly > quickly on at least a demo project, they are more likely to look > elsewhere or develope their own, thus weakening or slowing down the > MyFaces project as a whole. > > - Brendan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:11 AM > To: MyFaces Discussion; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Compatibility with SUN RI > > > first: you need to replace myfaces-jsf-api.jar and the > myfaces-jsf-impl.jar to get rid of the MyFaces implementation. > > If that does not run, either, here what I think: > > Even though many (not all) of the custom components work with the RI, > I would doubt that the whole example application works with the RI... > there are many hooks used in the examples which depend on the > implementation, afaik. > > I would say you should try to setup your own examples. > > regards, > > Martin > > On 6/22/05, Balaji Saranathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > For certain reasons, I have to show that the using myfaces > > components > is > > compatible with the SUN JSF RI, though we might go ahead and use > Myfaces > > completely. I tried replacing the myfaces-jsf-api.jar with Sun's > > implementation in the myfaces-examples application. However, I get > only a > > blank screen, no error messages too. I removed the commons-el.jar > > and > jsp2.0 > > jar from the WEB-INF/lib directory. Can any one throw some light on > the > > same? > > > > Your help is appreciated. > > > > Thanks > > Balaji > > > > > > Confidentiality Notice > > > > The information contained in this electronic message and any > attachments to > > this message are intended > > for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain > confidential or > > privileged information. If > > you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at > > Wipro > or > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately > > and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. > > > > > > > Confidentiality Notice > > The information contained in this electronic message and any > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the > addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. > If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at > Wipro or [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately and destroy all copies of > this message and any attachments. > > Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
