MYFACES-228 is still not resolved. Try changing openDataTable.jsf in the simple examples. Modify the <h:outputText> and change to <h:inputText>. Modified values are lost once you click a header or "scroll" to a new page.
sean On 7/5/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I imagine we will find a few bugs as we go along. UIData is such a > massive beast! I think Mathias has gotten us off to the right start > though. His solution is definitely simpler. Feel free to send me a > patch once its ready. > > sean > > On 7/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well, there is a bug in the new UIData implementation. ActionListener are > > fired although the commandLink was not clicked. > > I'm in contact with Mathias to solve this. > > > > Regards, > > Mathias Werlitz > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 05.07.2005 18:30:47: > > > > > > > OK I committed these changes. Thanks for looking into this! > > > > > > Can we remove HtmlDataTablePhaseListener now? For now I just applied > > > your patch but its seems like we can remove it. > > > > > > I will test it now in simple apps to see if MYFACES-228 is any better > > > now. This will be good news because we need this code for something > > > at work that we are starting this week. > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > On 7/5/05, Broekelmann, Mathias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > HtmlDataTablePhaseListener is obsolete, but only commented out of > > > > > > > > HtmlDataTableHack is still used and is just updated. > > > > > > > > I've tried to create a new patch with modified path. > > > > > > > > Mathias > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 5:03 PM > > > > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > > > > Subject: Re: MYFACES-228: preserveDataModel=true and > > > > > x:dataTable fixed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I haven't tried creating a patch from the project root since the > > > > > reorg. I guess the next best thing is to manually edit the path in > > > > > the patch after you create it so people can just drop it in and run > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > So what's the deal with those other two classes? > > > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/5/05, Broekelmann, Mathias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > > > > > > > > I´ve saw that if I don´t make it from root my path > > > > > structure above the project is used in the patches, which is > > > > > the problem right? > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to create that patch on project root but svn > > > > > does not create one (only an empty file). I´ve tried tortoise > > > > > and subclipse without success. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mathias > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 4:21 PM > > > > > > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > > > > > > Subject: Re: MYFACES-228: preserveDataModel=true and > > > > > > > x:dataTable fixed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mathias, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So far this looks good. I like that you've found a way > > > > > to workaround > > > > > > > treating UIData, etc. in a special manner when saving and > > > > > restoring > > > > > > > states. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm having trouble with the Tomahawk patch. SVN is > > > > > complaining about > > > > > > > HtmlDataTablePhaseListener and HtmlDataTableHack. Are > > > > > you removing > > > > > > > these classes? If not, can you generate a new patch for > > > > > just those > > > > > > > two? (Generate from the project root please.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/5/05, Broekelmann, Mathias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to solve this issue. I´ve reimplemented the > > > > > > > UIData and derived DataTable components for this issue. > > > > > > > However it will take some time to test all usecases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is what I´ve done so far: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - reduce the error phrone and complex code in > > > > > > > saveDescendantComponentStates and > > > > > restoreDescendantComponentStates. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - using StateHolder.saveState and restoreState methods for > > > > > > > nested components. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - no special handling for nested UIData components > > > > > needed any more > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - get rid of phase listener for datatable > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As far as I´ve tested my implementation it works nicely. I > > > > > > > will do some more tests today in our application which > > > > > > > heavily uses the UIData components to see if it works. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If anyone is interessted to check if my code is running in > > > > > > > your application you may apply the patch which is attached. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mathias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 5:34 PM > > > > > > > > > To: MyFaces Discussion; Mike Kienenberger > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: MYFACES-228: preserveDataModel=true and > > > > > > > > > x:dataTable fixed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The bug is marked "in progress", so no, it has not been > > > > > > > fixed yet. At > > > > > > > > > the moment it is assigned to me but I am looking for > > > > > volunteers to > > > > > > > > > take a detailed look at this one. I'm a little tied up > > > > > > > with the reorg > > > > > > > > > so any help would be appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/1/05, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Is preserveDataModel patch mentioned in > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-228 considered > > > > > > > > > working as > > > > > > > > > > of tag BEFORE_SVN_REORG (2005-06-25-ish)? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a x:dataTable with h:inputText elements that don't > > > > > > > > > update if I > > > > > > > > > > specify preserveDataModel="true", but dataTable does update > > > > > > > > > my data if > > > > > > > > > > I don't include that attribute. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not using sorting, but I am using the standard > > > > > "car example" > > > > > > > > > > x:dataScrollers. However, removing the dataScrollers > > > > > > > > > doesn't seem to > > > > > > > > > > change the behavior. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My value binding for dataTable is > > > > > > > > > > value="#{viewSecRolePage.secRoleList}" and the following > > > > > > > > > methods exist > > > > > > > > > > on the class, but the setters are never triggered. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public List getSecRoleList() { /* [...] */ } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void setSecRoleList(List preservedList) > > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > // breakpoints set in here are never hit. > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void setSecRoleList(Object preservedListObject) > > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > // breakpoints set in here are never hit. > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
