+1 for next release 1.1.0 asap -Manfred
2005/7/27, Mathias Broekelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 The last release is almost 5 month ago. So it´s time for a new release. > > We should also make a 1.1.0 version since we have some structual change > like tomahawk and shouldn´t go the way 1.0.10, 1.0.11 ... > > Regards, > Mathias > > Martin Marinschek schrieb: > > yes, I think that the nightly build files are signed. So really all we > > would have to do is declare them as RC-1 and put them up somewhere to get > > going. Well, and get 3 +1s, of course. > > > > with you and me, that makes 2 - another one out there wanting a new release? > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 7/27/05, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > yes, that would be fine. > > > > in apache term you must roll out an RC and wait for feedback from > > committers > > and even users. We need three binding +1 (from committers) > > > > also you have to sign the released files. I saw that Sean did > > something for that. > > > > For MyFaces 1.0.9 I used PGP on my own box... > > > > -Matthias > > > > On 7/27/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sounds cool... > > > > > > another thing is that I have suggested releasing a 1.0.10 (or a > > 1.1) - > > > there has not been much feedback though on this. > > > > > > What's up, fellow committers, fancy a new release? > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available at > > > http://www.bluesunrise.com/maven/. > > > > Those are what I've been using. There was a short time where I > > did put > > > > jars up on a private server for my dev team because of a couple of > > > > issues we were having with the released versions. I was just > > hoping to > > > > get something official setup. If the question is hosting it, I > > can do > > > > that. Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn > > update > > > > and push snapshots out. I'll probably wind up doing that soon > > anyways > > > > on a private server. If there's enough interest I might as well > > go > > > > ahead and make it public. > > > > > > > > Rich > > > > > > > > Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > > > > > >We should ask James Mitchell. He is a new committer to MyFaces > > (he's > > > > >a longtime committer on Struts.) He is constantly jabbering on > > and on > > > > >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-) > > > > > > > > > >I'm not sure if a nightly build is warranted but I think we > > should > > > > >have jars for the official release builds (starting with the > > 1.0.9 > > > > >which has already been released.) > > > > > > > > > >Let see what James has to say ... > > > > > > > > > >sean > > > > > > > > > >On 7/26/05, Richard Wallace < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Any chance of getting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo > > somewhere > > > > >>for those of us using maven in our projects? > > > > >> > > > > >>Thanks, > > > > >>Rich > > > > >> > > > > >>Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there have been many bug > > fixes > > > > >>>since the release. The timing of the next release is still up > > in the > > > > >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the moment so > > IMO, you > > > > >>>always want to be using the latest release even if its not yet > > > > >>>official. > > > > >>> > > > > >>>sean > > > > >>> > > > > >>>On 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFaces. > > > > >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or grab the latest nightly build? > > > > >>>>Have a lot of bugs been fixed since the release? > > > > >>>>Are we getting close to a new release? > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy? > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting > > bugs that > > > > >>>>have already been fixed. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>What are people using? > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>Thanks > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > >
