Yea, something like that. That's another good reason for leaving tomahawk out of the JBoss distro for now. You might be able to do some classloading config to fix the problem. We just have to see how people react, which is why it would be great to have some beta testing happen.
Stan Silvert JBoss, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://stansilvert > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruno Aranda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:45 AM > To: MyFaces Discussion; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next? > > Yes, it's wonderful, but I see one drawback. Many users use myfaces > because of the tomahawk components. We will have to explain them that > they have to include the tomahawk.jar in their lib folder (or put it > in the jboss tomcat folder where the actual jsf libraries are). > Problems will arise when a user tries to use a newer tomahawk version > (e.g. nightly) because it may be incompatible with the version embeded > in jboss. Then we will have to tell him/her that he has to replace the > jars from the jboss folder. Am I right? > > Bruno > > 2005/7/27, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Cool thing! > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 7/27/05, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For this release, we are not shipping tomahawk. We just ship > > > myfaces-impl.jar, myfaces-api.jar, and the needed third party jars. > > > > > > I'd like to start shipping tomahawk at some point but I don't have > > > enough experience with that to support it right now. > > > > > > Once cool thing is that the JSF standard taglibs are integrated with > our > > > Tomcat container so that they are globally available. You can also > add > > > your own tag libs to the shared TLD cache. This is something that is > > > talked about as an optional feature in the JSP 2.0 spec, but Tomcat > > > itself doesn't support it yet. > > > > > > This puts JSF on the same level as Servlets and JSP's. You don't have > > > to worry about packaging it with your app. It is just there. > > > > > > Stan Silvert > > > JBoss, Inc. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > callto://stansilvert > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Sean Schofield [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:18 AM > > > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > > > Subject: Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next? > > > > > > > > Stan, > > > > > > > > Will JBoss use the myfaces-all.jar or the individual jars > > > > (myfaces-api, myfaces-impl, tomahawk)? Or will tomahawk ship with > > > > JBoss at all? > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > On 7/27/05, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd love to see a new release. I need some post 1.0.9 bug fixes > for > > > the > > > > > MyFaces integration that we are doing for the JBoss 4.0.3 app > > > server. > > > > Right > > > > > now the version of MyFaces that is in our CVS is one that I had to > > > build > > > > > locally. It would be much better if we could ship a "blessed" > > > version > > > > of > > > > > MyFaces called 1.0.10. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I'd love it if some of you could try out the JBoss/MyFaces > > > > integration. > > > > > You will need to build from CVS which is very easy to do. You > just > > > do > > > > an > > > > > anonymous checkout and run build.bat or build.sh. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.jboss.com/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=CVSRepository > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The detail for the integration is here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stan Silvert > > > > > > > > > > JBoss, Inc. > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > callto://stansilvert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 2:10 AM > > > > > To: MyFaces Discussion; MyFaces Development > > > > > Subject: Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds cool... > > > > > > > > > > another thing is that I have suggested releasing a 1.0.10 (or a > > > 1.1) - > > > > > there has not been much feedback though on this. > > > > > > > > > > What's up, fellow committers, fancy a new release? > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available at > > > > > http://www.bluesunrise.com/maven/ . > > > > > Those are what I've been using. There was a short time where I > did > > > put > > > > > jars up on a private server for my dev team because of a couple > of > > > > > issues we were having with the released versions. I was just > > > hoping to > > > > > get something official setup. If the question is hosting it, I > can > > > do > > > > > that. Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn > > > update > > > > > and push snapshots out. I'll probably wind up doing that soon > > > anyways > > > > > on a private server. If there's enough interest I might as well > go > > > > > ahead and make it public. > > > > > > > > > > Rich > > > > > > > > > > Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >We should ask James Mitchell. He is a new committer to MyFaces > > > (he's > > > > > >a longtime committer on Struts.) He is constantly jabbering on > > > and on > > > > > >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > >I'm not sure if a nightly build is warranted but I think we > should > > > > > >have jars for the official release builds (starting with the > 1.0.9 > > > > > >which has already been released.) > > > > > > > > > > > >Let see what James has to say ... > > > > > > > > > > > >sean > > > > > > > > > > > >On 7/26/05, Richard Wallace < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Any chance of getting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo > > > somewhere > > > > > >>for those of us using maven in our projects? > > > > > >> > > > > > >>Thanks, > > > > > >>Rich > > > > > >> > > > > > >>Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there have been many bug > > > fixes > > > > > >>>since the release. The timing of the next release is still up > > > in > > > > the > > > > > >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the moment so > > > IMO, > > > > you > > > > > >>>always want to be using the latest release even if its not yet > > > > > >>>official. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>sean > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>On 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFaces. > > > > > >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or grab the latest nightly > build? > > > > > >>>>Have a lot of bugs been fixed since the release? > > > > > >>>>Are we getting close to a new release? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting > > > bugs > > > > that > > > > > >>>>have already been fixed. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>What are people using? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>Thanks > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
