You are welcome, I and my other me are happy to provide answers to
your questions ;-)

Regards,

Bruno

2005/7/29, Don Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks to both of you for the info.  I'll try using tomahawk.jar, and
> plan on switching to the MyFaces JSF in the near future.
> 
> Don
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruno Aranda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 11:16 AM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: myfaces-extensions.jar in nightly build?
> 
> > Should I definitely plan on switching, or should the MyFaces + Sun JSF
> RI combination continue to work fine.
> 
> We in the myfaces team always test the components with the myfaces
> implementation, so there may be glitches and incompatibilities from time
> to time with the RI (now there are some with the JScookmenu, for
> instance), but of course, we try to fix all that too...
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bruno
> 
> 2005/7/29, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Well, that jar does no longer exist. Now you have to use the
> > tomahawk.jar, which is the equivalent to the one you are looking (with
> 
> > the enhancements and fixes!) and contains the myfaces extensions and
> > components,
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > 2005/7/29, Don Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > I am using MyFaces with the Sun JSF RI, and currently using build
> > > 1.0.9.  I would like to try the nightly build since it looks like
> > > there have been some important fixes and enhancements.
> > >
> > > But I don't see the myfaces-extensions.jar in the nightly builds...
> > > am I missing it, or does it no longer exist?
> > >
> > > I did download the source and build MyFaces, but have not found any
> > > way to build this .jar.
> > >
> > > Maybe it is time for me to switch to the MyFaces JSF implementation,
> 
> > > but at this point in our project we don't want to make that change
> > > (but probably I can do that late next month).  Should I definitely
> > > plan on switching, or should the MyFaces + Sun JSF RI combination
> continue to work fine.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Don
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to