Sorry, I meant to type "undergo" as in Struts classic will continue to be actively developed for a long time to come. Darn my fast fingers.. :)
Don On 8/10/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quick correction: Struts is _not_ forking in any sense of the word. > Struts Ti is a sandbox project several of us are working on as an > exploration of a simplified framework more like Ruby on Rails than > JSF. It has not been accepted as a Struts subproject, just as Shale > has not been accepted as "Struts 2.0". > > The Struts project is currently in, what I would call, a state of > exploration. In addition to Shale and Ti, there are other projects > like Struts Overdrive, Struts Flow, etc., which are also exploring > different aspects of web development. Of course, there will be Struts > classic still for a long time to come which will continue to forego > active development. > > I think Struts is realizing there is no "one way" when it comes to web > development. If a particular project or approach interests you, join > in. Personally, I think shale will be a great success building on the > strong JSF framework, and if it meets your needs, give it a shot. > Just as not every web application is the same, neither is their needs > for a framework. > > Don > > On 8/10/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Those of you on the Struts Developers list. Would you like to comment on > > this? > > > > > > -- > > James Mitchell > > Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist > > Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance > > EdgeTech, Inc. > > http://www.edgetechservices.net/ > > 678.910.8017 > > AIM: jmitchtx > > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Skype: jmitchtx > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 7:29 AM > > Subject: Re: JSF vs. Struts > > > > > > currently the are *forking* :) > > > > Struts Ti > > > > see here: > > http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/[email protected]/1854691.html > > > > and Shale (aka Struts 2.0) is build on top of JSF. > > > > It is a framework for JSF ... > > > > > > > > On 8/10/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Doing both, I only can recommend, if you can omit struts and go > > > directly for MyFaces (not the JSF RI, it lacks severely) > > > > > > Struts feels somewhat dated in many areas compared to JSF. > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > Aleksei Valikov wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > Could anyone post a good link on Struts vs. JSF comparison? I have a > > > > meeting in 40 minutes where I need to push through my decision on using > > > > JSF for a large project (GIS/Map Viewers). Seems like I can argument my > > > > decision, but some additional support material would be helpful. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > > > Bye. > > > > /lexi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
