On 8/23/05, CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the above case wouldn't you need to end up registering both XyzAction and XyzBean as managed beans? It would seem like you would have to. I guess not a big deal, but you'd end up with double the number of typical backing beans.
-- As another alternative, the practice we've been following is to have an
XyzAction class and a separate XyzBean class. The Action class has a
managed reference to the Bean class and has all the logic in it. The
Bean class is just a straight JavaBean and contains all the data needed
by the JSF page.
In the above case wouldn't you need to end up registering both XyzAction and XyzBean as managed beans? It would seem like you would have to. I guess not a big deal, but you'd end up with double the number of typical backing beans.
Rick
