Craig McClanahan wrote:
CDDL *is* open source. It *can* be used freely (under the license
terms, just ike anything else, but please read it before you make
incorrect assumptions). It *is* being developed in an open project
(at java.net).
For the market as a whole, it just means there will be two open source
impementations of the spec.
Just as a minor question, if the ASF accepts the CDDL license as apache2
compatible, wouldnt it make more sense, to base future myfaces-core
versions directly on the ri and try to improve the core code from there?
After all, we have sort of a reinventing the wheel situation there
which was caused by licensing issues in the past.
Wouldnt it be better to have most of the work going into tomahawk
and other extensions and push myfaces sort of into the direction
of an improved RI?
Werner
