=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Carsten_Höhne?= wrote:
Hello,

I notice that jsf make a huge use of javascript.

In Italy we have an odd law on making PA web sites and services
accessible by disable people.. and javascript is almost banished...


The same is true for germany. (german: barrierefrei)

But why is only Javascript a problem? Another kind of problem are the available Layoutmanager and HTMLRenderer for JSF. They are all tablebased, exept some developed by oracle. So you run in trouble when trying to reorganize the layout with css. ( For an example: Look at www.w3.org to see what can be done with css.)


a css based html renderer is doable, but the abandoning of javascript is much harder...

the main problem is, the handling of events and actions, which root directly into the controller logic.

The current implementation is that basially with an event or
an action a form is set with post values and then a submit is done.

This is the only way to get multi form behavior in HTML,
not really the only one, but the only one where you do not run into browser barriers.

I will give an example, for a behavior of two different actions javascript less you have to do following

<a href="http://targetserver/targetapp/targetpage.jsp?action=first";>do action1</a>


<a href="http://targetserver/targetapp/targetpage.jsp?action=second";>do action2</a>

what seems to be at the first approach a viable approach on how to abandon javascript, if you look closer this approach becomes more than problematic:

if the href string becomes longer than 256 characters, which can happen in more complicated forms you run into the issue, that some browsers simply cut the string without warning.

To bypass this you have to use javascript and dynamically set hidden form fields, or something similar.


So asking for an event system, validation, different submit possibilities etc... and then abandoning javascript is close to impossible with a combination of possibly endlessly long field lists.

so trying to do it without javascript (I know at least myfaces has the option) means you cut down severely on functionality, dont expect the command links to work as ecpected anymore, you have to replace them with buttons, ditto for the event system etc...

Reply via email to