The board is still deciding on this, but probably it will be possible. regards,
Martin On 9/14/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My personal gues is, it will be mostly an issue whether the ASF will > accept the CDDL as apache 2 compatible or not... > What is the latest status on that issue? > > > > Werner > > > Randahl Fink Isaksen wrote: > > Like so many others I have been searching the web for a good > > templating/rendering engine, and have read about several competing > > technologies including, Tapestry, Clay, and Facelets. Choosing one of > > theese technologies is hard, I think, but of course the choice would be > > much simpler if the MyFaces developers chose to integrate one of these > > technologies into MyFaces. For what I have read, none of the > > technologies have a very plug-and-play feel in combination with MyFaces. > > As an example, if you want to use Facelets, you need to manually tie > > Facelets to Tomahawk using some additional xml code to take advantage of > > the MyFaces Tomahawk components - this is of course something which > > could work out of the box, had Facelets been an integrated part of MyFaces. > > > > Then, in the mailing list archives I came accross some e-mails which > > indicated that Facelets might become a standard, integrated part of > > MyFaces. I find that very interesting. I cannot say whether Tapestry, > > Clay, or Facelets would be the right choice, but from a MyFaces user's > > perspective it would make a great difference if at least one of these > > technologies where supported out of the box. > > > > Could anyone share their thoughts about this? > > > > > > Randahl > > > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Trainings in English and German
