Well, newer versions normally can work ok as long as they are
backwards compatible. Use them at your own risk...

Regards,

Bruno

2005/9/22, Bjørn T Johansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The versions listed, how strict are they? Have to use these versions or can 
> one use newer
> versions?
>
> BTJ
>
> Rick Gruber-Riemer wrote:
> > Done (http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Library_dependencies). Unfortunately
> > there is a formatting problem with the last table row, which I cannot
> > resolve :-(
> >
> > Onsdag 21 september 2005 09:13 skrev Martin Marinschek:
> >
> >>Maybe we should have this at the WIKI?
> >>
> >>As it might change quite often, and also users could edit it?
> >>
> >>Can you start off with a page like that?
> >>
> >>regards,
> >>
> >>Martin
> >>
> >>On 9/21/05, Rick Gruber-Riemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi
> >>>
> >>>I think that the "Getting started with Apache Myfaces"
> >>>(http://myfaces.apache.org/gettingstarted.html) page sould be updated
> >>>with regards to dependencies: # There is no more $MYFACES/lib directory
> >>>in either thesource or binary distribution file (at least int the
> >>>zip-file). # Some of the libraries have versions, some have not. It is
> >>>nice to know, whether you can use the newest versions of e.g. some of the
> >>>Jakarta Commons libraries or not. Also e.g. Hibernate might have a
> >>>different set of libraries ... # For those that have no version I came up
> >>>with the following version numbers based on version 1.0.9: * Commons EL:
> >>>1.0
> >>>      * Commons Logging: 1.0.4
> >>>      * Commons Validator: 1.2.0-dev (which build?)
> >>>      * Jakarta ORO: ??? I use the one from MyFaces 1.0.9, which is a pre
> >>>ORO 2.0.x version without details in the Manifest
> >>>
> >>>=> Could some of the developers please verify the versions and possibly
> >>>update the webpage? => If the dependencies no longer are part of the
> >>>distribution (which I would prefer), then I would suggest to have links
> >>>to the Jakarta projects in the table on the getting started page.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks ... Rick
>

Reply via email to