Can't vote on 564, as it's been closed.
Isn't there some process by which bugs are verified as correctly
fixing the problem before they are closed?
-- Jon
On Sep 23, 2005, at 8:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The issue is still open ... so the patch was not applied yet.
By the way, the tree2 is corruped by patch MYFACES-564: command
components for a node do not work anymore.
I already commented the issue but no response so far. Vote for
MYFACES-568 and MYFACES-564 maybe this speeds up a bit.
Regards,
Mathias Werlitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 23.09.2005 15:16:40:
> Hi,
>
> Anybody know if this patch has made it to the nightly build?
>
> Thanks,
> Emmanuel
> On 9/18/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that this is probable, Sean, out tree2 expert is now busy
with
> the release, but when this is over I am sure he will take a look to
> the patch. To me that patch seems ok but I am not familiar with
tree2.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bruno
>
> 2005/9/18, Emmanuel Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > ok, but in any case do you know if the patch will make it into
the nightly
> > build next week?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Emmanuel
> >
> >
> > On 9/17/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You can always build the jars yourself using the source
code. Just do
> > > SVN checkout and apply the patch.
> > >
> > > Right now we are focused on the MyFaces 1.1 release on Monday.
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> > > On 9/17/05, Emmanuel Jay < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have the same problem as my app involves changing the
tree2 all the
> > time,
> > > > modifying node, changing the root...
> > > >
> > > > I really hope the patch will make it in the build soon!
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > Emmanuel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 9/16/05, Enrico Nicola Mirco <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > Thank you very much for your answer. I hope the patch will
> includes in
> > the
> > > > nightly builds quickly.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You could set preserveToggle="false", but this is the
general
> > problem
> > > > that the tree does not "like" dynamic changing tree
structures, because
> > the
> > > > TreeState is not notified of the changes.
> > > > > > I will propose a patch that will make the tree more
tolerant to
> > > > "incompatible" states, see MYFACES-568.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 15.09.2005 14:56:15:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have a tree2 with showRootNode="true"
preserveToggle="true"
> > > > > > > clientSideToggle="true".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I describe my problem:
> > > > > > > 1) I open a JSP popup page with a tree2 (there are
many nodes
> > under
> > > > the root);
> > > > > > > 2) I expand some node;
> > > > > > > 3) I close popup;
> > > > > > > 4) I reopen the popup with another tree2 that, in
this case, has
> > > > > > > only the root because the datamodel is empty. When I
> open the page
> > > > > > > the following error occurs:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Encountered a node "0" with an illogical state. Node
is expanded
> > > > > > > but it is also considered a leaf (a leaf cannot be
considered
> > > > expanded.)"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When I populate the TreeNode the new TreeNodeBase is
create as
> > Leaf,
> > > > > > > and then, if it has at least a child, I set Leaf=false.
> I tried to
> > > > > > > set Leaf=false but the problem is not resolved.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I tried to use collapsePath("0") in the backbean but
it doesn't
> > work.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think the tree attempts to restore the previous
tree node state.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please everyone help me!!!
> > > > > > > Thank you
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
