Mark the issue type as JSR-127.
On 9/25/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you open this as an issue? > > regards, > > Martin > > On 9/24/05, Andreas Schenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Montag, 12. September 2005 11:13 schrieb > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > You can use this config in your web.xml, there should be no JavaScript... > > > > Thanks for your hint about how to suppress JavaScript output using context > > parameters. This may work, but I still think, that MyFaces violates the JSF > > specification: > > > > The method ViewTag.doAfterBody() (of the core view action) explicitely > > depends > > on the HTML RenderKit -- at least for client side state saving. As far as I > > understand chapter 9.4, this is a violation of the spec, or is it not? > > > > Chapter 9.4 states: "All JSF implementations must provide a tag library > > containing core actions that are independent of a particular RenderKit." > > > > Using a RenderKit for some markup different from HTML, this code in the > > method > > will not work. I don't know how much harm it does, though (yet). But I would > > guess, that client side state saving should not work for a different > > RenderKit. > > > > P.S. I am referring to the nightly built from 20050812. I don't know whether > > the code has been changed in the meantime. > > > > Regards, > > > > Andreas Schenk > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Trainings in English and German >
