>>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:16:57 +0200, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> said:
MM> Hmmm,
MM> I'll try to include Ed on this discussion - wonder what he thinks on this.
MM> @Ed: We have discussed how your proposed solution to the ordering
MM> problem of the faces-config.xml files would also solve the problem
MM> that a user might need to reorder them to fix problems occuring by a
MM> wrong load order?
MM> If I understand your solution right, the jar-files would always be
MM> ordered by their name - which might not always be the perfect solution
MM> we would want to have.
Yes, that's right. Ordered by name. I know it's not optimal, but it
does get the job done.
Ed
--
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
| homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
| aim: edburns0sunw | iim: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
