Have you ever tried the stand-alone-mode with HSQLDB and JPOX? I'm
currently trying to create an AJAX-JSF-Component which comes with an
embedded mini-database to provide user-files like java-scripts from
the embedded database instead of the filesystem: The database-files
and the database itself are stored in the JAR-File which will be
unpacked if needed. Using JDBC it works great - I have all the 
advantages of a Database and the users who use my component don't need
to set up a database, execute sql-statements, configurate mapping
files etc. They just copy the JAR in the lib-folder and my programm is
doing the rest with its own mini-database.

Nevertheless it's not working when I use stand-alone-mode of HSQLDB
and jpox (which is also mentioned at the jpox-site
http://www.jpox.org/docs/1_1/rdbms.html)

Have you also discovered similar problems? Or do you know whether it
is possible to (re)store a memory-resident-database from a
hsql-database-file?

2005/10/7, Keith Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I recently started using JPOX with a memory resident HSQLDB and had no
> problems whatsoever. It actually made life quite easy.
>
> Also they're going to be the JDO 2.0 RI
>
>
> >Hi everybody,
> >
> >for a new JSF/MyFaces-Project I need to use JDO for my ORM. Has
> >anybody of you guys already made experiences with several opensource
> >JDO-Frameworks and MyFaces?
> >
> >Any commendations or warnings on which framework I should use or better not 
> >use?
> >
> >--
> >Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Greetings,
> >Hendrik Neumann; Ruhr-University of Bochum
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Greetings,
Hendrik Neumann; Ruhr-University of Bochum

Reply via email to