-----Original Message----- Hm, probably someone could extend Jtidy to support the Pretty HTML feature also... -----/Original Message----- We still can "give it back to them", if they want...
-----Original Message----- Writing to log-files IMHO is a little bit difficult to work with. Often you have some problems in the HTML (incorrect view in a special browser, Jscript errors etc.) and then you have to check different files and different lines of occurencies... -----/Original Message----- So far I was considering the problem of log-file-access. But I think that most developers should normally have access to log-files... On the plus-side for log-file-output: The are easier to post-process (grepping, searching, archiving,...) than the browser's source-view -----Original Message----- I think, the Pretty-HTML is something for development and later you disable it for live system to increase the performance. -----/Original Message----- Obvious. But it can make lots of sense to deploy it also to production just in case you need a real html-copy in case of problems -----Original Message----- BTW: there is a issue on JIRA for this now: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-744 -----/Original Message----- I'v seen it (monitoring also the dev-list), but I think the discussion of the requirements for this "new" JTidyFilter should be done here to reach more people. That should give us a good feeling what we should implement... regards Alexander PS: An alternative would be a chat-session in the #myfaces-channel...
