I just re-read my last post (along with the resulting responses) and, besides the typo I found in my post, realized that my statements were too general. I hope I didn't offend. What I meant to say was that I liked Craigs idea better "for my current problem".
The help on this list has been great. I didn't intend to convey anything negative.
Bobby
P.S As for updating the wiki FAQ - I feel inadequate, as I've never done it before, but I'd be willing to help out. Someone would have to point me in the right direction... and provide a map. ;-)
On 11/18/05, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Thanks. I hadn't considered the possibility that this wasn't a managed bean.
> So if it's an unmanaged bean, it sounds like it's better to work with
> the Map directly, but if it is a managed bean you probably don't want
> to do that since the bean may not exist yet.
>
But as long as the bean is managed, I dont understand why all this
resolver stuff is recommended instead of the manager-property stuff?
As long as you are able to avoid any faces specific stuff in your bean
its easier to reuse such a bean, isnt it?
---
Mario
