On 12/8/05, Ryan Wynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/7/05, Volker Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Ryan Wynn wrote: > > > Anyway, this works as intended. The span gets updated with the > > > correct html and it looks far better than an entire page refresh. My > > > problem is that setting the innerHtml does not seem to be > > > reinterpreting embedded javascript and stylesheet references. > > > innerHtml was the easiest way to accomplish what I wanted, I don't > > > argue it may not be the best. Can anyone help explain to me why if my > > > new html content has <script src="x"></script> that script will not be > > > interpreted using innerHtml? > > > > I can't explain :-). > > But maybe i can help. I am using prototype [1] to refresh content via > > ajax and there is the javascript part outfiltered before setting to > > inner html and the javascript part is, (if via options enabled) > > evaluated afterwards via javascripts 'eval()' command. > > > > regards > > Volker > > -- > > Don't answer to From: address! > > Mail to this account are droped if not recieved via mailinglist. > > To contact me direct create the mail address by > > concatenating my forename to my senders domain. > > > > Volker, that was helpful. I switched from dojo to ajaxAnywhere which > like Prototype utilizes the eval() command. This worked much better. > > I encountered a couple problems though. I am using the myfaces > calendar component which evidently uses document.write(). This breaks > the page when eval is called. Does Prototype have any support to > workaround this? > > Also, I noticed that AjaxAnywhere as well as dojo seem to be posting > my checkboxes incorrectly. I haven't figured this out yet, but it > seems to be posting them as true even when they are unchecked. If I > remember correctly the normal behavior is to not send the parameter at > all if the checkbox is unchecked. Do you know if Prototype handles > this correctly? > > Thanks, > Ryan >
Scratch the checkbox problem. I think that's a problem in my application code. But the document.write is still an issue for me. I am investigating a workaround that does not require me to change tomahawk.
