That's already a problem with the Tobago component set. Or, to get more precise, even within the MyFaces component set we have overlap - look at t:tree and t:tree2.
We'll still try to workout a solution so that users are not overwhelmed with choice - but, right, choice is not categorically a bad thing ;). regards, Martin On 12/15/05, Nicklas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Oracle will open source 104 components of the ADF faces component set > > - there are still some more not being open sourced, but they might > > follow if the first donation is as successful as we suspect. In fact, > > I doubt you'll miss any functionality in JSF world with the combined > > component sets of Cherokee, Tobago and Tomahawk. > > > > > What do you think the future of Tomahawk will be? There seems to be > overlapping (not that it's categorically a bad thing) if it is complemented > with a complete set of uniformally designed components. > > This could indeed be a big boost for the JSF community/popularity. > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
