People were saying that Seam gets rid of a layer that was actually said to be necessary the last years.
Plus obviously the EJB EG had doubts that the annotation support was properly aligned with what EJB 3.0 has to offer. regards, Martin On 12/15/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The Seam session today was full as well, even though there were > > several objections mouthed against Seam in the questions after the > > session - so it wasn't all positive there. > > > Interesting, what objections? > To my mind only a handful come to my mind > a) Too many dependency libs > b) startup times as it seems in the tomcat example are hilarious :-( > > (well there are some pattern issues in the seam examples themselves but > that is not really seam related) > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
