I wrote, > > Also, it'd be better if you could replace the phase listener with > > something else. Maybe you could queue a new event? Too bad there's > > no component involved, otherwise you could just override > > processUpdates(). There may not be an easy replacement, though.
On 12/17/05, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess I can create a component too, but then it might only work if the > container renders its children, no? > I'll have a look at it. No, I don't think you can create or want to create a component. It's a listener for existing components. I was just remarking that it'd be a lot cleaner if there were something similar to component.processUpdates() that you could override. Unfortunately, I haven't done much with user-initiated events, so I don't know for sure if you can queue your own events instead of using a phase listener.
