> Why would you reject Shale without at least considering whether the > mock objects could help you? Shale builds on top of what JSF gives > you. Shale + JSF are natural partners. Nobody says you have to use > Shale but I wouldn't make a decision without investigating it.
I just don't want use entire Shale right now... > IMO the best reason for not using Shale would be that you are still > trying to understand JSF and you want to take it slow. If you are to > the point where you need mock objects that's probably not an issue for > you. Maybe you is right, if i'm not wrong i need to understand all jsf lifecycle and then write my mock objects. > Every few days a user will post a question here and the answer will be > "You should look at Shale." So my guess is that it might be more > helpful to you then you think. The real reason is, there's no example there about how to do it. -- Yours truly (Atenciosamente), Rogério
