On 1/16/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why would Sun need to relicense the JSF 1.2 RI? It's already under an open source license (CDDL).
It's up to Apache to decide whether or not to accept a dependency on CDDL-licensed code, as it does for (say) BSD licensed code.
CraigCraig McClanahan schrieb:
> Glad to hear it! But, please understand that at Apache I have just one
> voice among many. If the MyFaces community considers this to be an
> important issue, then you need to ask your PMC to raise the urgency of
> dealing with this with the Apache Board, and (in particular) the VP of
> Legal Affairs, Cliff Schmidt (to avoid spam attacks, I'll leave it to
> you to figure out what his Apache email address is :-). Many voices
> have more influence than one voice.
>
Wouldnt it be easier to relicense parts of the RI under a different
license, or is that forbidden within Sun?
Why would Sun need to relicense the JSF 1.2 RI? It's already under an open source license (CDDL).
It's up to Apache to decide whether or not to accept a dependency on CDDL-licensed code, as it does for (say) BSD licensed code.
