> Currently i am also evaluating JTidyServlet, but currently i do not have
> that special case. Guess that if your html is prepared to be
> xml-conform, not having a <html> element is of no interest to JTidy. I
> am interested in your findings so please keep us updated. BTW What's
> your current JTidy config esp. the config parameters? - My current JTidy
> config is :


I do not use JTidy myself. It's used as part of UPortal, which is the target
framework my application should run under. I've no further information about
the configuration of JTidy. In a few days/weeks, I will have to try my
application running under UPortal in the institution I'm working for, and my
application has to be prepared...


Regards,

Matthias

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag
> von lij
> Gesendet: Montag, 6. Februar 2006 13:09
> An: MyFaces Discussion
> Betreff: Re: AW: Programmatically created UI does not contain important
> HTML elements
>
>
> Currently i am also evaluating JTidyServlet, but currently i do not have
> that special case. Guess that if your html is prepared to be
> xml-conform, not having a <html> element is of no interest to JTidy. I
> am interested in your findings so please keep us updated. BTW What's
> your current JTidy config esp. the config parameters? - My current JTidy
> config is :
>
> <filter>
>         <filter-name>JTidyFilter</filter-name>
>         <filter-class>
>             org.w3c.tidy.servlet.filter.JTidyFilter
>         </filter-class>
>         <init-param>
>             <param-name>tee</param-name>
>             <param-value>false</param-value>
>         </init-param>
>         <init-param>
>             <param-name>config</param-name>
>             <param-value>
>                 tab-size=4;wrap:5000;output-xhtml:true;
>             </param-value>
>         </init-param>
>         <init-param>
>             <param-name>doubleValidation</param-name>
>             <param-value>false</param-value>
>         </init-param>
>         <init-param>
>             <param-name>validateOnly</param-name>
>             <param-value>false</param-value>
>         </init-param>
>         <init-param>
>             <param-name>doubleValidation</param-name>
>             <param-value>false</param-value>
>         </init-param>
>     </filter>
>
> Matthias Kahlau wrote:
>
> >>AFAIK most browsers do wrap content with HTML tags in case content does
> >>not self set html...body. Guess you can inspect that by looking in the
> >>DOM inspector in Mozilla/Firefox after browsing to such "special"
> >>html-pages.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >In my special case, the rendered code has to go to the JTidy filter of
> >UPortal, which transforms the HTML code to XHTML (AFAIK). I don't know if
> >JTidy is capable to transform incomplete HTML pages...
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Matthias
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag
> >>von Jörg Liegler
> >>Gesendet: Montag, 6. Februar 2006 01:05
> >>An: 'MyFaces Discussion'
> >>Betreff: AW: Programmatically created UI does not contain important HTML
> >>elements
> >>
> >>
> >>AFAIK most browsers do wrap content with HTML tags in case content does
> >>not self set html...body. Guess you can inspect that by looking in the
> >>DOM inspector in Mozilla/Firefox after browsing to such "special"
> >>html-pages.
> >>
> >>Jörg
> >>
> >>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Februar 2006 16:48
> >>An: Users MyFaces
> >>Betreff: Programmatically created UI does not contain important HTML
> >>elements
> >>
> >>Hi!
> >>
> >>
> >>I examined the HTML source code of my programmatically build view and
> >>noticed, that no HTML elements like <html> or <head> are rendered, but I
> >>wonder because the page is rendered correctly in MS IE.
> >>
> >>Do I have to manually add the missing elements, e. g. with the
> >>ResponseWriter? (I need valid HTML...)
> >>
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>
> >>Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to