On 1/25/06, Nicklas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is the internal String -> Date convertor supposed to be so forgiving that > it wraps 66.01.2006 (dd.MM.yyyy) into 07.03.2006 without > as much as a complaint? I have a custom validator but it only kicks in after > an "OK" date has been generated.
I don't know the answer as to how lenient it is supposed to be, but you can use a custom converter to make it less lenient. You can probably make your custom converter a subclass of the original converter, maybe with a setLenient(false) call on the date formatter. I haven't looked at the source to see how hard that'd be.
