You can change the component to put CSS & JS resources in the body (as opposed to the head). Although it's not valid HTML to have <style> tag in <body>, I think all browsers support it. Should be no problem to have <script> in <body>.
Also see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-434 if you haven't yet. Luo. Haihua wrote: > Hi, > > by chance I have found this comment in the DefaultAddResource.java (Line 591): > > ... > if (HEADER_BEGIN.equals(position)) > { > //todo: fix this to work in PortletRequest as well > HttpServletRequest request = (HttpServletRequest) > context.getExternalContext() > .getRequest(); > ... > > So there should be one of the important places to support Portlet. I guess > there should be some corresponding place where the response is called, after > invoking the suggested method. The error should happen there. > > Regards, > > Haihua > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Volker Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Montag, 13. Februar 2006 12:07 > An: MyFaces Discussion > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: integration problem with > <s:inputSuggestAjax> and portlet > > Hi, > > add > > <category name="org.apache.myfaces.custom.ajax"> > <priority value="debug" /> > </category> > > i think the categorys "org.jboss.*" are not of interest here. > > But if your suggest method is invoked the listener seems working, but > the encodeAjax of inputSuggestAjaxrenderer did not output "<html ...", > just the "<ul ...". > > No idea what is going on there, maybe the portlet add those? > > > > Regards, > Volker > > Luo. Haihua wrote: >> Hihi, >> >> I have modified the log4j.xml in following lines: >> ****** >> ... >> <category name="org.jboss.web.localhost.Engine"> >> <priority value="ALL"/> <<--modified here >> </category> >> ... >> ****** >> I think that is what you meant, isn't it? >> >> Then followings are the outputs. It seems that all are related with Pluto >> (portlet container) only. (The last two lines are the output of my suggest >> method. So does it mean that the Ajax decode stuffs were not invoked? >> >> Regards, >> >> Haihua >> >> ****** >> 11:32:36,616 INFO [JBossTrigger] [:handleNotification]Done >> 11:32:40,445 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]ServiceManager: Loading >> services... >> 11:32:40,460 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]ConfigService >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,460 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]ConfigService done. >> 11:32:40,476 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]LogService initializing... >> 11:32:40,476 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]LogService done. >> 11:32:40,476 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]FactoryManagerService >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,491 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]FactoryManager: Loading >> factories... >> 11:32:40,491 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]ObjectIDFactory >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,491 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]ObjectIDFactory done. >> 11:32:40,507 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortletConfig >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,507 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortletConfig done. >> 11:32:40,523 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortletURL initializing... >> 11:32:40,523 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortletURL done. >> 11:32:40,523 INFO [Engine] >> StandardContext[/pluto]DynamicTitleServiceFactory initializing... >> 11:32:40,523 INFO [Engine] >> StandardContext[/pluto]DynamicTitleServiceFactory done. >> 11:32:40,538 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]HttpServletResponse >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,538 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]HttpServletResponse done. >> 11:32:40,538 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]NamespaceMapper >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,538 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]NamespaceMapper done. >> 11:32:40,554 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]ActionResponse >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,554 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]ActionResponse done. >> 11:32:40,570 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]RenderResponse >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,570 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]RenderResponse done. >> 11:32:40,585 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortalContext >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,585 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortalContext done. >> 11:32:40,585 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]HttpServletRequest >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,585 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]HttpServletRequest done. >> 11:32:40,585 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]ControllerFactory >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,585 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]ControllerFactory done. >> 11:32:40,601 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortletPreferences >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,601 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortletPreferences done. >> 11:32:40,616 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]ActionRequest >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,632 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]ActionRequest done. >> 11:32:40,632 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortletContext >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,632 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortletContext done. >> 11:32:40,648 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortletInvoker >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,648 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortletInvoker done. >> 11:32:40,648 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]RenderRequest >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,663 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]RenderRequest done. >> 11:32:40,663 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortletSession >> initializing... >> 11:32:40,663 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PortletSession done. >> 11:32:40,679 INFO [Engine] >> StandardContext[/pluto]InformationProviderFactory initializing... >> 11:32:40,679 INFO [Engine] >> StandardContext[/pluto]InformationProviderFactory done. >> 11:32:40,679 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]FactoryManager: Factories >> initialized (18 success >> ful). >> 11:32:40,679 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]FactoryManagerService >> done. >> 11:32:40,695 INFO [Engine] >> StandardContext[/pluto]PortletDefinitionRegistryService initializing... >> 11:32:42,179 INFO [Engine] >> StandardContext[/pluto]PortletDefinitionRegistryService done. >> 11:32:42,179 INFO [Engine] >> StandardContext[/pluto]PortletEntityRegistryService initializing... >> 11:32:42,257 INFO [Engine] >> StandardContext[/pluto]PortletEntityRegistryService done. >> 11:32:42,273 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PageRegistryService >> initializing... >> 11:32:42,320 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]PageRegistryService done. >> 11:32:42,320 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/pluto]ServiceManager: Services >> initialized (6/6 success >> ful). >> 11:32:42,648 WARN [LocaleUtils] Locale name in faces-config.xml null or >> empty, setting locale to de >> fault locale : zh_CN >> >> 11:34:20,101 INFO [STDOUT] suggest processQname: AMHotfolderDecide >> 11:34:20,101 INFO [STDOUT] suggest processQname: AMFtpDecide >> >> ****** >> >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Volker Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Gesendet: Montag, 13. Februar 2006 10:49 >> An: MyFaces Discussion >> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: integration problem with <s:inputSuggestAjax> >> and portlet >> >> Hiu, >> >> Luo. Haihua wrote: >> >>> Hihi, >>> >>> it seems sth. Interesting: the alert function returns the whole html page >>> text instead of the inner ul text! >> >> this is the case when the request is not handled by the >> AjaxDecodePhaseListener, or the listener did not find a requestParameter >> "affectedAjaxComponent". you can set log level to debug to see if the >> listener is invoked. >> >> Regards, >> Volker >> >> >>> So is that the problem when generating response text with MyFaces? Or >>> portlet? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Haihua >>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: Volker Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 17:09 >>> An: MyFaces Discussion >>> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: integration problem with <s:inputSuggestAjax> and >>> portlet >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> you can add a "alert(request.responseText)" on top of onComplete >>> function in myFaces.js to see what the server respond. This breaks the >>> function, because of focus lost in input, but you see what you get from >>> server. >>> >>> if this is not "<UL><LI>..." there is somthing wrong, and will not >>> displayed, this is just what i observed when testing, i haven't looked >>> deeper to see why. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Volker >>> >>> Luo. Haihua wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hihi Volker, >>>> >>>> I have checked out all the sources from the myfaces-current in svn and >>>> finally found out all the necessary js... >>>> >>>> With your files all javascript errors were gone! (Really a right way >>>> further! :)) But then it does not list the suggestions at all without any >>>> error report both in front end and back end, although the suggestion >>>> method defined in my bean has already been called. >>>> >>>> After somehow source code debug, I have found that the buffer defined in >>>> InputSuggestAjaxRenderer.class (Line 263) has already got what I wish to >>>> list until here: >>>> ------------ >>>> buf.append("</ul>"); >>>> >>>> context.getResponseWriter().write(buf.toString()); >>>> ------------ >>>> >>>> Then where will it be sent? How can I access the generated buffer? Really >>>> stuck...:( >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Haihua >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>> Von: Volker Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 12:27 >>>> An: MyFaces Discussion >>>> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: integration problem with <s:inputSuggestAjax> and >>>> portlet >>>> >>>> Hi Haihua, >>>> >>>> no i haven't modified other files. >>>> >>>> in svn is version 1.5 of script.aculo.us files, from whre controls.js came. >>>> >>>> in version 1.4 (which was in myfaces until 22-dec-2005) the function was >>>> called "base_initialize", since 1.5 it is renamed to "baseInitialize". >>>> >>>> seems your sources are outdated, please update to svn head for testing >>>> this patch. >>>> >>>> I you haven't updated since maven-reorg you may need to do a clean >>>> checkout, see: >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Building_With_Maven >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Volker >>>> >>>> Luo. Haihua wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Volker, >>>>> >>>>> have you also modified the other js files? It says here that the js >>>>> function "baseInitialize" cannot be found. >>>>> >>>>> I have checked your js file: In your file there is a function called >>>>> "baseInitialize", while in my control.js it is called "base_initialize". >>>>> >>>>> So maybe there is a new update of control.js? However, I could not find >>>>> it in svn...:( >>>>> >>>>> Kindest regards, >>>>> >>>>> Haihua >>>>> >>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>>> Von: Volker Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2006 19:54 >>>>> An: MyFaces Discussion >>>>> Betreff: Re: AW: integration problem with <s:inputSuggestAjax> and portlet >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> yes this and related changes in myFaces.js was my first idea, but this >>>>> did not work right. >>>>> I added a additional field to the options. >>>>> >>>>> Seems you have the sources? please try the attached files, it works on >>>>> my tomcat, but i can't test on a portlet. >>>>> >>>>> If this works i can commit this into svn. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Volker >>>>> >>>>> PS: please rename myFaces.js-xxx as myFaces.js, js files are blocked >>>> >from my firewall. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Luo. Haihua wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Volker, >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks for ur always warm-hearted reply!:) >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you mean sth. like this in InputSuggestAjaxRenderer.java? >>>>>> >>>>>> out.writeText("', {\n" + >>>>>> " method: 'post',\n" + >>>>>> ... >>>>>> " parameters: 'affectedAjaxComponent=" + clientId + >>>>>> "',\n" + >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>> It seems that it still not work... >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Haihua >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>>>> Von: Volker Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2006 11:50 >>>>>> An: MyFaces Discussion >>>>>> Betreff: Re: integration problem with <s:inputSuggestAjax> and portlet >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> i think this can be solved by adding the parameters as post parameter to >>>>>> the options, instead of empty. >>>>>> >>>>>> I will give it a try this afternoon (german time). >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Volker >>>>>> >>>>>> Luo. Haihua wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi dear all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am using portlet and want to insert a tag <s:inputSuggestAjax> into >>>>>>> one of my .jsp page. However, it doesn't work due to a javascript error >>>>>>> "element.getClassName has no properties" in firefox. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have read the generated html file, even jumped deeply into the source >>>>>>> codes of myfaces and found following problem: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Within the generated html page, myfaces generates following javascript >>>>>>> codes for inputSuggestAjax: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <SCRIPT type=text/javascript><!-- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> new >>>>>>> Ajax.MyFacesAutocompleter('Pluto_ProcessOverviewPortlet_r1_c1_p1__id0:Pluto_ProcessOverviewPortlet_r1_c1_p1__id2','Pluto_ProcessOverviewPortlet_r1_c1_p1__id0:Pluto_ProcessOverviewPortlet_r1_c1_p1__id2_auto_complete','*/pluto/portal/ProcessOverviewPortlet/_ac_ProcessOverviewPortlet_r1_c1_p1/AC/_pid/ProcessOverviewPortlet_r1_c1_p1**?**org.apache.myfaces.portlet.MyFacesGenericPortlet.VIEW_ID=%2Fview.jsp**?**affectedAjaxComponent=Pluto_ProcessOverviewPortlet_r1_c1_p1__id0:Pluto_ProcessOverviewPortlet_r1_c1_p1__id2*', >>>>>>> { >>>>>>> >>>>>>> method: 'post', >>>>>>> >>>>>>> asynchronous: true, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> parameters: '', >>>>>>> >>>>>>> callback: function(element,entry) {return >>>>>>> entry+'&jsf_tree_64='+encodeURIComponent(document.getElementById('jsf_tree_64').value)+'&jsf_state_64='+encodeURIComponent(document.getElementById('jsf_state_64').value)+'&jsf_viewid='+encodeURIComponent(document.getElementById('jsf_viewid').value)} >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> }) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> //--></SCRIPT> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Note that the third parameter of the js function, which should be an >>>>>>> encodeURL, contains TWO "?", the first is generated by the portlet, the >>>>>>> second by the myfaces! Therefore it is no more a valid encodeURL to >>>>>>> parse by myfaces! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So it seems that inputSuggestAjax does not support any call by a page >>>>>>> whose URL already contains parameters. Any tips or suggestions how to >>>>>>> resolve this problem? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kindest regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Haihua Luo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> > -- Dave Brondsema Software Developer Cornerstone University
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
