Even easier - use the MyFacesServlet and extend from that ;)

regards,

Martin

On 2/16/06, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes,
>
> Spec wants it to be final, I think there is no reason for that, it just does
> not make any sense, however there are two tricks if you want to extend it.
> We have used the second one and worked well but first one is much easier to
> try.
>
> * Use a proxy instead and delegate to the actual faces servlet.
>
> * Using AspectJ you can be able to modify the faces servlet.
>
> You can check out how to apply these tricks at;
>
> *
> http://www.jroller.com/page/cenkcivici?entry=why_the_heck_is_faces
>
> *
> http://www.jroller.com/page/cenkcivici?entry=p_during_the_past_two
>
> Regards,
>
> Cagatay,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >  I've seen an important modification : Is there any reason that the
> > > FacesServlet class is now final?
> >
> > Yes, the spec told us ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> > >  Many thanks by advance
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >  Guillaume Doumenc
> > >  StudioGdo : Maîtrisez votre communication...
> > >  Tél : +33 (0)6 11 95 24 78
> > >  Courriel : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > Zülpicher Wall 12, 239
> > 50674 Köln
> > http://www.wessendorf.net
> > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>


--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to