Well that sounds like we're making progress if you can't reproduce one of the bugs.
Sean On 2/23/06, Hendrik Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well I'm sorry, but I think that the problem descriped was not a bug - > the problem was related with my "populateTree"-Method which did some > "really ugly things". > > At least the "Node is expanded but it is also considered a leaf" is > gone and not reproducible for me. > > Nevertheless, thank you for your helpfulness! > > 2006/2/22, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I am happy to try and help out but I need a little more investigation > > from you guys. You will need to investigate the latest source code > > and let me know where things are breaking down. Unfortunately there > > are some issues getting the new release done that are taking up most > > of my time. > > > > So if you are serious about fixing this, please dig in and provide an > > explanation as to where exactly things are failing (in the code iself) > > instead of just describing the usecase. If you do this, I can likely > > help you better. Keep in mind I'm not doing any dynamic tree stuff > > myself (yet) so you will need to help me help you. > > > > Sean > > > > On 2/22/06, Hendrik Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have the same problem... this issue still seems not to be fixed > > > > > > 2006/2/8, Michal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I've got the same problem - I believe that's the problem of storing old > > > > tree > > > > somewhere (as it's client side toggle tree). Is there any way to update > > > > it? > > > > Some flush cache method's ;) or something? I really stuck with this, > > > > tried > > > > almost all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Greetings, > > > Hendrik Neumann; Ruhr-University of Bochum > > > > > > > > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Greetings, > Hendrik Neumann; Ruhr-University of Bochum >
