I agree with you. We can do that in two seperated jsps. But I interested in how to deal with them in one page with some condition determination.
On 3/2/06, CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I haven't had my morning coffee (GMT-6.00), so left in some > extraneous words in the last e-mail that made it difficult to read. It > was *supposed* to read: > > I know that this doesn't answer your immediate question, but wouldn't it > be easier and more explicit to put the common elements inside a JSP, and > then to include that JSP inside each of two other JSPs, each with its > own button that has its own action (update vs. create)? Then you > wouldn't have this flag-setting and control issue happening underneath. > > - Brendan > > -----Original Message----- > From: CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:44 AM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: RE: JSF Bean Life Cycle Question > > > I know that this doesn't answer your immediate question, but wouldn't it > be easier and explicit to do put the common elements inside a JSP, and > then to include that JSP inside each of two other JSPs, each with its > own button that has its own action (update vs. create)? Then you > wouldn't have this flag-setting and control issue happening underneath. > > - Brendan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anthony Hong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 7:39 AM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: JSF Bean Life Cycle Question > > > I have a page for creating an object. I found update page have same > fields except an internal ID and its button is updaing not creating. > So I add a boolean field in control bean to represent current action > is update or create. > My control bean scope is "request" in faces-config.xml > > I enter create page, click save button, In that function, I change > status to true which means edit mode. Then the update botton is > displayed, but click that button has no effect, control bean method > was not invoked. but boolean flag is OKAY, its true in that time > What's wrong with it? > > -- > > Anthony Hong > -- Anthony Hong
