First the heap space problem just appears in the client side handling of the tree if I use it in the server side handling there is no heapspace problem. So, I have now a logic which change to the server side logik if there are too many nodes.
But I have an other issue. I would like to have following behavior:
A user open a couple of nodes which exists in the same path of the tree. Then the user open a node in a new path. For this case I would like to have that the nodes in the other path are closed. Is this behavior possible for the tree 2?
Thanks in advance.
2006/2/22, Onur Tokan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
You can try disable extension filter, and add necessary resources to
you web root which are avaible in the jar file. Because extension
filter adds it's filter URL to every resouces in the html.
Regards,
Onur
On 2/22/06, Hans Sowa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm,
>
> ok, but why do I have the heap space problem because I also have it if I use
> the server-side toggle. I can create the 26.000 nodes without any heap space
> problems but then if the tree2 controls tries to create the visible part of
> the tree I get a heap space problem. Can you imagine what the problem is?
>
> 2006/2/22, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The tree already ignores nodes that are not expanded (in the
> > server-side toggle.) Its only the server-side toggle that does not
> > ignore them and that's because it can't. It needs the whole tree b/c
> > it needs to be able to show any/all nodes the user might decide to
> > expand.
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > On 2/22/06, Hans Sowa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > My heapspace configuration is min 32 max 128.
> > >
> > > Maybe it is a good idea to partially load the data. This should solve
> the
> > > problem with the heap space. But if I use the server side toogle I think
> it
> > > would be a good idea if the tree component would ignore the nodes which
> are
> > > not shown in the tree. Maybe this is an idea for a future enhancement.
> > >
> > > The other issue is the html code. Is there a possiblity to decrease the
> > > htmloutput. The html code for one node is really large and a big problem
> for
> > > the browser (especially for IE).
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/2/22, Mario Ivankovits < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Hi!
> > > > > Eventually I envision an Ajax version of the tree2 component.
> > > > >
> > > > +1
> > > > It will definitely be great to have a ajaxed tree2.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ciao,
> > > > Mario
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > mfg Hans Sowa
> > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> mfg Hans Sowa
> mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
mfg Hans Sowa
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
