not only that, facelets 1.1.1 did not work on tomcat 5.5 for me. Only
worked on 5.0. I don't know if that is facelets instability or tomcats.
dean
Igor Marakov wrote:
Cool has nothing to do with it. Examples are there to provide starting point
for the technology and supposed to be running 'out of the box'. If I have
problems getting examples for two consecutive releases to work, something
tells me that risk of using this particular technology in real life is
unacceptably high.
Like I said, it is just my personal opinion. Your mileage may vary.
Igor
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 10:14 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: JSF and Tiles
Uh, so basically you're saying you never actually used
it, but you can also claim it'll be a year before it's ready
for a serious production app? Not cool...
-- Adam
On 3/26/06, Igor Marakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't seen 1.1 version. Dropped the idea after not being able to get
examples for 1.0.6 and 1.0.7 to work.
Igor
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 11:53 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: JSF and Tiles
On 3/25/06, Igor Marakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the other hand, both Facelets and Shale/Clay are still too (IMO)
immature
to become a basis for serious production app. Next year maybe...
Have you used Facelets recently? In my opinion, Facelets 1.1 is
very much ready for prime time. And given my day job, I have
very high standards for "ready for prime time".
If I were starting a new project today, I wouldn't consider using
JSPs (much less Tiles).
-- Adam Winer
