> Martin Marinschek schrieb: > >>> You don't show in your tutorials how to > customize > >>> the action methods > >>> if need be, though. > >> Sorry, missing the point... Maybe you could give > me an > >> example of what you wanted to accomplish? > >> > > > > If I understood the framework right, you define > new > > expression-language statements which have a > special meaning. E.g., > > create a new object. There might be cases where > just calling the > > constructor is not enough - and I want to > interfere with the creation > > process. Same, and probably even more necessary on > save. Do you define > > and make available such hooks? > >
> Well the way I see it, this framework can cover 70% > of all simple crud > usecases. > Ok we do not have the clear bo/dao pattern here, but > for simple apps amd > normal crud forms you do not need that, the same > goes for special > creation code. Yes, I completely agree. We do not try to cover everything with Rumba - I do not think it is possible/viable. But we want to simplify typical activities while allowing a developer to use plain Java coding for all the advanced tasks. We do not hide the power of JSF and Hibernate in any case building a higher level abstraction on top. > > This is a clear contestor for making it very simple, > especially since it > also seems to be able to cope with scoping via bean > pushing over > parameters and it does not seem to be the > configuration hell seam is. Thank you :) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
