On 4/4/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem James speaks of has been fixed in the latest release of prototype.
What remains is a pollution of the namespace. Prototype defines
classes like 'Effects' or 'Event'. How big is the chance that another
library might do the same? Decide if that's a risk you want to take,
for a framework, it's not a risk you should take.
Now I discussed with the prototype guys to fix that, but the response
was not positive, so we decided to switch to dojo.
regards,
Martin
On 4/3/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >we were happy with rico & prototype... :)
>
> You may want to check out James McParlane's blog before you bring prototype.js or any of it's derivatives into your application.
>
> http://blog.metawrap.com/blog/WhyIDontUseThePrototypejsJavaScriptLibrary.aspx
>
> >Mert
>
> Dennis Byrne
>
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
