I was already wondering myself. It would fit better in the component, if there is one.
Manfred? @Rich: Can you do a patch - would be great. regards, Martin On 4/19/06, Richard Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to make use of the Tomahawk updateActionListener action > listener in a Shale Clay based app and was having problems getting it to > work properly. After doing some debugging I realized that the problem > was that I was trying to map to the property "property" on the > UpdateActionListener class thinking that the tag "property" attribute > just passed the value through. > > On closer inspection I realized this isn't the case and that the > UpdateActionListenerTag itself takes the value set for the "property" > attribute and creates a value binding which is passed to the > UpdateActionListener with the setPropertyBinding() method. Similarly, > the UpdateActionListenerTag also figures out if the "value" attribute is > supposed to be an actual value object or a value binding. > > I searched this list and this was also a problem when trying to > integrate with Facelets. So my question is why is all this work done in > the UpdateActionListenerTag class instead of in the UpdateActionListener > class itself? Then the tag class would just pass the values through > like all the other tags in JSF. > > Rich > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
