Well I'm done the more significant aspects of tree2 so I think we could go forward now. Free time is still scarce (with all of the releases) but I am trying to learn more about facelets so this one caught my eye.
Let me know what needs to be changed (and why) and I will be happy to try and help. (The why part I think I am understanding more as I read about how facelets works.) Sean On 4/22/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/22/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you interested in reworking the patch? Now that we've refactored > > we need a new one. I will get to it eventually but if you supply a > > proper patch I will do it much quicker ;-) > > Hey Sean, > > I've been waiting to deal with this issue (as well as the extended > data table issue) for quite some time. You told me to hold off until > you were done refactoring tree2, but you never seemed to get back to > me on it :) > > At this point, our solution probably needs to create compatible > setter/getters on the component, but to continue to use the same > generic attributes internally to store the values for backwards > compatibility. At some point down the road, we should internally > stop supporting the generic attributes. >
