Thanks Andrew, I know your article which helps a lot. I am just afraid of facelets because I already have a lot of trouble with my tree2 components and the manipulation of them, with immediate submits and the different state saving method. I am really looking forward to the next version of tomahawk.
But it seems that I have to bite the bullet and try facelets. Maybe it isn't so bad. Do you recommend to drop tiles when using facelets or can they be used together? Michael -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2006 16:47 To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: identical pages with only different beans? Facelets works fine with tree2. You just need to write a component tag handler I have posted the code[1] for that tag handler (and others) to get tree2 and other MyFaces components working with facelets. -Andrew [1] http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Use_Facelets_with_Tomahawk On 5/3/06, Michael Heinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the quick response Mike. > > I read the two options and I am in doubt about the following statement > regarding alias beans for my use case: > > "Note also that component binding is not supported via "aliased" names. > Therefore the included page cannot include any component with a > "binding" attribute" > > So I can't use something like: > <h:selectOneMenu binding="#{myController.myMenu}"/> > > > Currently I don't use facelets in my project but tiles. > I have read in the wiki that facelets does not correctly work with tree2 > components. I am afraid of getting new problems when I add facelets. > > Michael > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2006 16:29 > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: identical pages with only different beans? > > Take a look at this url, particularly option 2 and option 3. > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Creating_Composite_Components > > On 5/3/06, Michael Heinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I have a design/architecture question: > > > > > > > > My page contains 2 nearly identical tabs. > > > > Both contain complex components like datatables with scrollers, > multiple > > trees, iframes and a lot of buttons. > > > > The first tab contains the result of a search with master/detail view > (a > > datatable and a detail data pane). > > > > The second tab has the same layout and contains all objects that are > related > > to the selected object on the first tab. > > > > In other words this is the result of a finer search based on a > selection on > > the first tab. > > > > The corresponding jsps are nearly identical therefore. The only > visible > > difference is that some components are not rendered according to a > flag. > > > > So they differ internally only in the used backing bean instances and > > bindings. > > > > > > > > How could I implement this most suitable? > > > > Is there an alternative to copy the jsp and replace the names of the > backing > > beans? > > > > > > > > Moreover I don't want to limit the application to client side state > saving. > > > > So server side state saving should be supported due to complex > searches in > > the backend. > > > > > > > > I thought a quick (developed) solution could be to open a new browser > window > > with a new http session for the same user. > > > > But this is not possible based on a link without invalidating the > first > > session, or is it? > > > > > > > > > > > > Any help or ideas are appreciated. > > > > Michael > > >
