-Andrew
On 5/15/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see these as significant advantages to making it a separate
> JAR. None of these should be marked as required dependencies for
> standard tomahawk use - they should all be marked as "provided"
> scope, which avoids the issue.
I agreee. Why not include the facelets config file in the META-INF of
the regular old tomahawk.jar? It certainly doesn't hurt anyone not
using facelets and it would be a major incentive to use MyFaces
components if they were able to be used with facelets out of the box.
> -- Adam
Sean
