Wolf Benz wrote:
Thanks but... this is what I knew so far :-)
What I want is not sharing an ENTIRE bean, just ONE variable. (a
managed property)
Is this possible as well?
Thought of these 2 possibilities: (donno whether it would work/ whether
at least one of them is correct)
<managed-bean>
<managed-bean-name>A</managed-bean-name>
<managed-bean-class>...</managed-bean-class>
<managed-bean-scope>session</managed-bean-scope>
</managed-bean>
<managed-bean>
<managed-bean-name>B</managed-bean-name>
<managed-bean-class>...</managed-bean-class>
<managed-bean-scope>session</managed-bean-scope>
<managed-property>
<property-name>beanB_varA</property-name> <!-- Name of the
very same var in bean B-->
<value>#{beanA.varA}</value> <!-- referencing this way
allowed?-->
</managed-property>
</managed-bean>
Hello Wolf,
I thing the first method should work, but! This will almost sure set the
property while instantiating the session bean. It means that those beans
will share one instance. When you use still the same instance it will be
all right. When you change the instance in A it won't be shared with B
any more. B will still have the old instance. That's my opinion.
This would mean that sharing int, boolean or other scalar type variables
would never work this way.
Best regards
Ondrej Svetlik
