I guess I could solve the #5 with checkboxes and an attribute "selected" for every node so it should not be a problem.
But I don't know how I can solve #1 to #4. I tried but I didn't work. So is there a example around where I can have a look or a description about this topic.
Thanks.
best regards
On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tree2 basically can do everything but #5. With some work I'm sure #5
would be possible although I can't say that I would find it very
useful. You would need a submit button to tell the tree component
that you are done selecting. Otherwise how would the component handle
your selections? Seems awkward.
Sean
On 5/29/06, Hans Sowa < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I always get an error-message If I try to send to
> [email protected]. This is my last try:
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> Here are the points which I hade/have problems:
> 1) The possibility to close the whole tree.
> 2) The possibility to open a certain path.
> 3) If the tree is created the first time we would like to open the first
> level.
> 4) The possiblity to close the last path if the user opens an other path.
> (This means only one path should open at any time and all other paths should
> be closed).
> 5) Multiselect should work. (Maybe with checkboxes).
> 6) The created HTML code should be as small as possible. (I don't think if
> this is really possible but it is not so important for me yet).
>
> The really important thinks for me are 1,2, 3 and 4.
>
> Becuase of 5) I think this should work with checkboxes without any problems
> but I had not try it so far.
>
> Because of 6) The created HTML Code is really to much. I saw a .NET Tree
> from a colleague and the created code are really small. So it would be great
> if the tree2 could make a diet for the future.
>
> So, it would be great if I could help for this items.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> best regards Hans
>
>
> On 5/26/06, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A good thought, but not always very practical. If there are a lot of
> > visible nodes, and the visible nodes have a lot of children, the
> > performance would be really bad. With the work Jacob and others are
> > doing on the Avatar front, an AJAX request to get the nodes could take
> > milliseconds, so the user wouldn't really notice it.
> >
> > Perhaps we can make sure that someone could extend the tree and do
> > this if they want under specific circumstances where they know it
> > would work.
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
> > On 5/25/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Here's something to think about in your free time. I was thinking
> > > that all nodes one level below all visible closed nodes should be
> > > buffered and made visible instanly via DHTML. Then an AJAX request
> > > goes out and creates a buffer for the nodes below the one you just
> > > opened. It should be as fast as client side toggle that way but
> > > without the overhead of tens of thousands of nodes in your DOM that
> > > never get shown anyways.
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > > On 5/25/06, Andrew Robinson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Will do, just may be a month or two before I have time for some open
> > > > source development.
> > > >
> > > > On 5/25/06, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I'm definitely interested in adding AJAX support to tree2. Perhaps
> > > > > you would like to help me with it? As a starting point you should
> > > > > familiarize yourself with the realtively new TreeWalker stuff if you
> > > > > are not already.
> > > > >
> > > > > My thinking with the TreeWalker is that it will ultimately be easier
> > > > > to render a portion of the Tree during AJAX requests b/c you can
> > > > > specify a start and end point, etc. Let me know how serious you are
> > > > > about helping and I can make some time for it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sean
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/25/06, Andrew Robinson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > I have used AjaxAnywhere and put a <aa:zoneJSF> tag around the
> tree.
> > > > > > With the Ajax4Jsf library getting some press, it would be
> interesting
> > > > > > to see how to make tree2 have AJAX support built in, or to create
> a
> > > > > > new tree component that extends or is similar to tree2 that would
> > > > > > support AJAX natively.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have avoided non-JSF AJAX solutions (like DOJO integration?) as
> I
> > > > > > want the full JSF lifecycle (no hacks) and AjaxAnywhere supports
> it
> > > > > > (and it looks from the website that Ajax4Jsf does as well - and
> does
> > > > > > it better).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Who knows, maybe we can scrounge up a team of volunteers to
> integrate
> > > > > > Ajax4Jsf into some new Tomahawk and/or Sandbox components. Once I
> get
> > > > > > some of the projects I am working on, on the side, done I may be
> > > > > > interested in looking into this (too bad writing open source code
> > > > > > doesn't pay well - or at all).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PS - I think we need a tax amendment in the US to get tax breaks
> for
> > > > > > open source development
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/25/06, Vesa Lindfors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We have also used tree2 successfully, with more or less similar
> requirements - but only for small trees (<100 nodes)
> > > > > > > In the near future we will also need tree for quite large
> amount of data (> 10 000 nodes).
> > > > > > > Andrew, it would be very usefully, if you could share some of
> your knowledge of combining the tree2 and Ajax...
> > > > > > > Or is there any known plans to add ajax support directly to the
> MyFaces tree2 component?
> > > > > > > ---VLi---
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > What is the problem(s) with tree2? I have been using it with
> the
> > > > > > > > functionality you requested. The only I find myself doing is
> using
> > > > > > > > server side nodes most of the time (with AJAX, as I have trees
> with >
> > > > > > > > 100,000 nodes), and I usually create custom tree models and
> custom
> > > > > > > > tree nodes as the "Base" ones don't ever have what I need.
> Perhaps we
> > > > > > > > can help you through your tree2 problems?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/24/06, Hansjörg Meuschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > > > you could take a look at http://www.ourfaces.net or
> > > > > > > > >
> http://www.jamesholmes.com/JavaServerFaces/#software-comp
> (a list of jsf
> > > > > > > > > comp.)
> > > > > > > > > I'm not sure if there is a tree meeting your requirements
> ...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > maybe this helps...
> > > > > > > > > greets hans
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hans Sowa wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi all
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We had a lot of problems with the tree2 component and we
> search now
> > > > > > > > > > for an alternative. The tree component is the most
> important component
> > > > > > > > > > in our webapplication and therefore this is a big risk in
> our
> > > > > > > > > > application.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Following behaviour to we need:
> > > > > > > > > > - The possibility to klick on every node and to be able to
> react
> > > > > > > > > > (ActionListener).
> > > > > > > > > > - The possibility to show graphics on the right side of
> the node.
> > > > > > > > > > - The possibility to close the whole tree.
> > > > > > > > > > - The possibility to open a certain path.
> > > > > > > > > > - The possiblity to close the last path if the user opens
> an other
> > > > > > > > > > path. (This means only one path should open at any time
> and all other
> > > > > > > > > > paths should be closed).
> > > > > > > > > > - Multiselect should work. (Maybe with checkboxes).
> > > > > > > > > > - The created HTML code should be as small as possible.
> > > > > > > > > > - If the tree is created the first time we would like to
> open the
> > > > > > > > > > first level.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It would be great if someone has experience with an other
> tree
> > > > > > > > > > component and could help me.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > mfg Hans Sowa
> > > > > > > > > > mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> mfg Hans Sowa
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
mfg Hans Sowa
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
