Maybe you should consider two features of Struts Shale: 1.) view
controllers, 2.) remoting.  This could give you what you want.  At a
minimum, you may want to steal some of the source code for your own
custom solution if you want to go that route.

Sean

On 6/15/06, Julian Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Gregg,

thats a good idea. I will have a shot at a wiki post.

 ________________________________

From: Gregg Bolinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:33 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion; Julian Ray

Subject: Re: Force creation of managed bean


Julian, thanks a bunch for the code.  Worked like a champ.  This should be
on the wiki.  There is a jsffaq link in the conversation but it doesn't
appear to work.

Gregg


On 6/15/06, Gregg Bolinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I found the info.  Thanks.  Trying it out.
>
>
>
> On 6/15/06, Gregg Bolinger < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This list or a forum?
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/15/06, Julian Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I posted some code oin the forum which shows how to get the faces
context from within a servlet. You might want to do a search and get take a
look.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > From: Gregg Bolinger < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: MyFaces Discussion <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:42:28 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Force creation of managed bean
> > >
> > > Ok, the problem with all this is that it's being done from within JSF
driven code.  I need to be able to do this from a plain jane servlet that
just happens to exist along side all the JSF stuff, if possible.  Either
method listed thus far returns a null faces context from within the servlet.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/15/06, octoberdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I beleive... I may be wrong.
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Force-creation-of-managed-bean-t1792885.html#a4886098
> > > > Sent from the MyFaces - Users forum at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


Reply via email to